"There is one side in this election that is far too timid, and far too closely allied with far too many people it ought not to be allied with at all, but which at least does admit the existence of a political commonwealth, and at least does recognize that self-government is an ongoing creative endeavor. And there is one side that simply does neither, and that has been quite clear about why it does not, and that has worked within the institutional structures of self-government to undermine the creative soul of the democratic project. And that has been a debate worth having, and that is the debate that will conclude today."

Vote!

(Source: neveralovelysoreal)

TINY ELECTION FREAKOUT

roxanegay:

Tomorrow is a big day.

Thus far, I have been relatively calm about the election. I am still relatively calm but my stomach is in knots. I cannot concentrate. I’m just trying to hold my shit together until Wednesday, when one way or another, I’ll know how much I should freak out.

I believe in the president. I believe in his chances. I believe in his vision and what he has accomplished. I believe, I need to believe, for once in my life, that there is only one possible outcome not because he is “Not Romney,” but because he is the best man for the job. He is not perfect but he is willing to improve. He is willing to help America improve. He is willing to face how many people in this country need his leadership.  He has social and economic policies that embrace a wider swath of Americans than his opponent. He understands that equality is a goal toward which we must all strive. 

The closer we get to November 6, the more committed I become to the President because the alternative, it terrifies me?

There has never been more at stake, both domestically and internationally. 

Romney is a candidate who is openly disinterested in people who are not like him. 

I can’t even get into what Romney means for women but if you are a woman and you support Romney, my heart hurts for you.

If you are a person of color who supports Romney, ditto. We can still be friends and whatnot but I need you to know the thought of your vote for him hurts. 

If Romney believed in anything, that would be better than what we’re facing. The problem is that Romney believes in nothing and everything at the same time. He says whatever he thinks people want to hear because he believes he should be president and will do or say whatever it takes to make that happen.

I often imagine him sitting in an empty room, devoid of decoration or personality, muttering to himself, over and over, “I should be the president of the United States.” I don’t even know that he really wants the job. He simply believes he has been pre-ordained for the position. It’s the next stage of his evolution from wealthy asshole to wealthy asshole with a finger on the trigger. This is how it often goes. 

Some of these conservatives out there make my skin crawl but at least they believe in something. At least they have genuine conviction. At least they have a consistent message. Romney doesn’t have that! And he lies, openly and knows he can.

I keep thinking about the third presidential debate, how Romney kept saying, essentially, “What he said,” and how shameless he was in that. Romney didn’t even try in that debate because he truly thinks he can run on the platform of “Not the black guy.”

I need Obama to win for so many reasons, but mostly because I don’t want to face the next four years in a country where Romney’s cynicism, laziness, and lack of character might be rewarded. I don’t want to deal with the possibility that being “Not the black guy,” might be enough. 

I have so many Thoughts & Feelings about the election; this post manages to engage with all of them far more eloquently than I ever could. (the parts I especially love are in bold, but really, the whole thing is great.)

I can’t wait for this to all be over. I’m really tired of worrying.


not2hate:

timekiller-s:

istealforksfromrestaurants:

Hi Tumblr, it’s me, a slightly older person…
I see a lot of you 20 somethings saying things about how you aren’t going to choose the lesser of two evils and that their policy on important matters are identical so what’s the point they’re both stooges for Wall Street and the Industrial War Complex. 
You are right. Kind of. 
I know y’all LOVE the 90’s. Me too. And I remember after after eight years of Clinton/Gore, I thought those motherfuckers were the devil. I was soooooooooooo upset with Bill Clinton waving his deregulation wand and his fucked foreign policy that I was all FUCK THE DEMOCRATS and I strongly advocated for Raplh Nader, even though he too didn’t really care about my “gonad politics.” Even when not choosing between the “lesser of two evils,” I was STILL having to compromise major issues. 
Having been an adult person through 8 years of Clinton/Gore and 8 years through Bush/Cheney, I can tell you without a shred of hesitation that I will line up like my ass is on fire to vote for the lesser of two evils because the greater of two evils almost had us all living outside and eating dog food. 
And if you think that a Romney presidency won’t be worse than Bush/Cheney, you are out of your mind. 
I am fucking begging all of you, please, go vote. Aside from the fact that far more dangerous things are happening on your local level, (like collective bargaining being taken away in Illinois) this shit does matter. 
If you think voting for Obama is the lesser of two evils, you’re wrong, it’s the lesser of three because not voting IS voting for Romney. Not voting is voting for dickbag judges that sentence people to jail in counties that have privatized prisons for minor drug infractions. Not voting is voting to remove pensions and collective bargaining and the last shreds of union power from the people. Not voting this election is voting for Feudalism.
Go vote. 
Now pardon me, there’s some damn kids on my lawn and they want candy. 

Bold emphasis is placed by me.

I genuinely do not want you in my life if you are able, but do not vote on Tuesday. I am not even fucking around. These motherfuckers want to send women back to the goddamn dark ages, and if I know that you helped that along by not voting, I will fucking end you. Not even kidding anymore.

yes, yes, yes; this, this, this.

not2hate:

timekiller-s:

istealforksfromrestaurants:

Hi Tumblr, it’s me, a slightly older person…

I see a lot of you 20 somethings saying things about how you aren’t going to choose the lesser of two evils and that their policy on important matters are identical so what’s the point they’re both stooges for Wall Street and the Industrial War Complex. 

You are right. Kind of. 

I know y’all LOVE the 90’s. Me too. And I remember after after eight years of Clinton/Gore, I thought those motherfuckers were the devil. I was soooooooooooo upset with Bill Clinton waving his deregulation wand and his fucked foreign policy that I was all FUCK THE DEMOCRATS and I strongly advocated for Raplh Nader, even though he too didn’t really care about my “gonad politics.” Even when not choosing between the “lesser of two evils,” I was STILL having to compromise major issues. 

Having been an adult person through 8 years of Clinton/Gore and 8 years through Bush/Cheney, I can tell you without a shred of hesitation that I will line up like my ass is on fire to vote for the lesser of two evils because the greater of two evils almost had us all living outside and eating dog food. 

And if you think that a Romney presidency won’t be worse than Bush/Cheney, you are out of your mind. 

I am fucking begging all of you, please, go vote. Aside from the fact that far more dangerous things are happening on your local level, (like collective bargaining being taken away in Illinois) this shit does matter. 

If you think voting for Obama is the lesser of two evils, you’re wrong, it’s the lesser of three because not voting IS voting for Romney. Not voting is voting for dickbag judges that sentence people to jail in counties that have privatized prisons for minor drug infractions. Not voting is voting to remove pensions and collective bargaining and the last shreds of union power from the people. Not voting this election is voting for Feudalism.

Go vote. 

Now pardon me, there’s some damn kids on my lawn and they want candy. 

Bold emphasis is placed by me.

I genuinely do not want you in my life if you are able, but do not vote on Tuesday. I am not even fucking around. These motherfuckers want to send women back to the goddamn dark ages, and if I know that you helped that along by not voting, I will fucking end you. Not even kidding anymore.

yes, yes, yes; this, this, this.

Working the Room

laphamsquarterly:

2012: “Conservatives want Mitt Romney to come out swinging early, often and hard during Wednesday’s first of three presidential debates with President Obama.

The Republican nominee’s aides have packed his debate lunchbox with several zingers, which the Republican nominee has been rehearsing for months. Partisans want him to empty that rhetorical clip to show he’s a fighter, and reverse the momentum of polls that show Romney behind as voters in 34 states are already casting ballots”.

1958: “John F. Kennedy knew who his grandfather was, and also his grandfather’s son. During a speech at the Gridiron Club dinner in March 1958, Kennedy, running for reelection to the Senate, pulled a piece of paper from his suit pocket that he said was a telegram from “my generous daddy.” He read, “Dear Jack: Don’t buy a single vote more than is necessary. I’ll be damned if I’m going to pay for a landslide.” Joseph Kennedy Sr. wielded considerable political power, and critics charged that his son stood to be the beneficiary of his influence.

The joke was no off-the-cuff remark. Ted Sorensen wrote that Kennedy prepared the speech for hours, that “in his eight years in the Senate, no speech assignment worried him longer or more deeply than his role as Democratic jester for the Washington Gridiron Club Dinner in 1958.”

Presidential candidates have often relied on one-liners to make points and deflect attention, but do they work? Michael Phillips-Anderson probes the marriage of politics and humor in “Working the Room”, from the Politics issue of Lapham’s Quarterly.

yesterday I was primarily focused on the chance to tell my Lincoln’s-beard story when I reblogged LQ—but I should also point out that their piece on presidential humor is a super-interesting read.

obviously.

buzzfeed:

Parenting magazine went to a block party in Brooklyn one recent afternoon to do some polling on the current election.

I think this girl should be president.

(via racialicious)

laphamsquarterly:


When Abraham Lincoln told a joke: 


His countenance and all his features seemed to take part in the performance. As he neared the pith or point of the joke or story, every vestige of seriousness disappeared from his face. His little gray eyes sparkled; a smile seemed to gather up, curtainlike, the corners of his mouth; his frame quivered with suppressed excitement; and when the point—or “nub” of the story, as he called it—came, no one’s laugh was heartier than his.


mydaguerreotypeboyfriend:


Abraham Lincoln, c. 1860. Thought to be the last beardless portrait of the soon-to-be president, this ambrotype was made for the portrait painter John Brown, who wrote: 


There are so many hard lines in his face that it becomes a mask to the inner man. His true character only shines out when in an animated conversation, or when telling an amusing tale…He is said to be a homely man; I do not think so.


Submitted by Lindsey




fun fact: Lincoln’s beard is pretty much the reason why the Milton Bradley game company exists. from this American Literature article* you can probably read if you’re on an academic-institution server:“In the summer of 1860, as the owner of the only lithographic press in western Massachusetts, Milton Bradley undertook creating a standard reproducible image of then–presidential candidate Abraham Lincoln. Bradley was a capable draftsman who previously had made a living sketching detailed patent drawings for the early inventors of the U.S. industrial boom. Now he saw an opportunity to turn his political passion for Lincoln into a profit: working from a photograph, he sketched a painstaking likeness of the candidate’s distinctive, clean-shaven face and pressed enough copies to populate every home in New England. For a time they sold incredibly well—that is, until Lincoln grew a beard. Biographer James Shea writes, ‘Bradley could not believe it. But … no one wanted a lithograph of a beardless Lincoln. Some even wanted their money back.’ Frustrated but not defeated, Bradley turned his disappointment with the scheme into a renewed energy to produce and sell a game he had invented just a few months earlier, The Checkered Game of Life.”*full disclosure(s): I am obsessed with this story, I’m married to the author of the article, & said author’s gmail address is daguerreotype…making him my literal daguerreotype boyfriend.

laphamsquarterly:

When Abraham Lincoln told a joke: 

His countenance and all his features seemed to take part in the performance. As he neared the pith or point of the joke or story, every vestige of seriousness disappeared from his face. His little gray eyes sparkled; a smile seemed to gather up, curtainlike, the corners of his mouth; his frame quivered with suppressed excitement; and when the point—or “nub” of the story, as he called it—came, no one’s laugh was heartier than his.

mydaguerreotypeboyfriend:

Abraham Lincoln, c. 1860. Thought to be the last beardless portrait of the soon-to-be president, this ambrotype was made for the portrait painter John Brown, who wrote: 

There are so many hard lines in his face that it becomes a mask to the inner man. His true character only shines out when in an animated conversation, or when telling an amusing tale…He is said to be a homely man; I do not think so.

Submitted by Lindsey


fun fact: Lincoln’s beard is pretty much the reason why the Milton Bradley game company exists. from this American Literature article* you can probably read if you’re on an academic-institution server:

“In the summer of 1860, as the owner of the only lithographic press in western Massachusetts, Milton Bradley undertook creating a standard reproducible image of then–presidential candidate Abraham Lincoln. Bradley was a capable draftsman who previously had made a living sketching detailed patent drawings for the early inventors of the U.S. industrial boom. Now he saw an opportunity to turn his political passion for Lincoln into a profit: working from a photograph, he sketched a painstaking likeness of the candidate’s distinctive, clean-shaven face and pressed enough copies to populate every home in New England. For a time they sold incredibly well—that is, until Lincoln grew a beard. Biographer James Shea writes, ‘Bradley could not believe it. But … no one wanted a lithograph of a beardless Lincoln. Some even wanted their money back.’ Frustrated but not defeated, Bradley turned his disappointment with the scheme into a renewed energy to produce and sell a game he had invented just a few months earlier, The Checkered Game of Life.”

*full disclosure(s): I am obsessed with this story, I’m married to the author of the article, & said author’s gmail address is daguerreotype…making him my literal daguerreotype boyfriend.

image

cheatsheet:

The Guardian wins for best poll-tracker of the day. 

yeah, I love this—both because it’s a great way to present information, & because it reminds me of this.

cheatsheet:

The Guardian wins for best poll-tracker of the day

yeah, I love this—both because it’s a great way to present information, & because it reminds me of this.

(via theatlantic)

so apparently Texts from Mitt Romney is a thing.(via the Awl)

so apparently Texts from Mitt Romney is a thing.

(via the Awl)

thenotes:

This Daily Show segment where Samantha Bee tricks RNC attendees into tacitly defending abortion is the best field piece they’ve done in years.

Al Madrigal did something similar a few months ago, but it wasn’t on nearly the same scale. the things they manage to coax out of their subjects’ mouths never cease to amaze me.